Know where AI pays before you spend.
Everyone says adopt AI. The audit answers where, in this firm, with what return and what risk. Two to three weeks, fixed fee, board-readable at the end. We sell no licences and take no vendor margin, so the answer is allowed to be no.
Every month the question stays open, another vendor answers it for you. That is the cost of waiting.
A SHORTLIST THE BOARD CAN READ, WITH THE FIRST BUILD COSTED
Firms of 20-200 people who keep hearing "adopt AI" and cannot yet name where it pays. Often the board has asked for an AI answer, somebody has bought licences, and the pilots keep stalling. The audit is the cheapest, shortest way to turn that noise into a decision.
If you already know the workflow that hurts, skip the audit and read the production IT agent. If nobody owns technology at all, start with the Head of IT seat.
No vendor slides. We read the firm the way an operator reads it.
Every candidate use-case gets three scores. Return: hours or pounds, measured against what the workflow costs today. Risk: what happens when the AI is wrong, and who is accountable when it is. Readiness: whether the data, the permissions and the tenant can actually support it. The shortlist is ranked on all three.
The use-cases that fail are written down too, with the reason. The board should know what was considered and why it lost. And where the readiness score is the blocker, the roadmap starts with the groundwork: a tenant made ready, the evidence pack, or waste in the bill reclaimed to fund the work.
We sit with the people who actually do the work: operations, finance, the service desk, whoever owns the workflow that hurts.
Two to three weeks, fixed. The pack lands board-readable: the scores, the shortlist, the groundwork, and the sequenced roadmap with the first build costed.
Your call. Run the roadmap yourselves, take the first build as a sprint, or fill the seat. The audit stands alone either way.
Where the hours and the money actually go today.
Use-cases scored on return, risk and readiness, ranked.
Security, licensing and tenant checks, written down.
Sequenced, board-readable, first build costed.
From £4,950, fixed.
Two to three weeks, and the price is the price: agreed before we start, whatever we find. If the honest answer is that AI has nothing to earn here yet, the pack says so, and the roadmap starts with the foundations instead.
The audit is how most firms meet us. The roadmap prices what comes next, and you can take it to anyone.
All six services, and the framework they belong to, are on one page.
A board-readable pack: where the hours and the money go today, a shortlist of AI use-cases scored on return, risk and data readiness, the groundwork check on security and licensing, and a sequenced roadmap with the first build costed.
Two to three weeks elapsed. We sit with the people who run the work, read the estate, and score what we find. It is deliberately short: the point is a decision.
No. The audit is tool-independent and vendor-independent. We sell no licences and take no vendor margin. If the right answer is to buy nothing yet, the roadmap says so.
The roadmap prices the first build honestly, and you can take it to anyone. If a workflow is better served by an off-the-shelf product, or by your MSP, the pack names that instead.
Readiness is one of the three scores. AI is only as good as what it can see, and what it must never see. The audit checks ownership, retention, labels and access before recommending that anything switches on.
Your call. Some firms take the roadmap and run it themselves. Some take the first build as a production agent sprint or Copilot readiness. Some fill the Head of IT seat. The audit stands alone either way.
The first conversation costs nothing and changes what happens next. Bring the board question, the stalled pilot, or the workflow eating someone's day.
Call 0117 456 5486. The voice that answers is our own AI call agent, in production, on our own line. We run our practice on what we sell. Hear it running.
The call button dials the line above.
