Do you replace our MSP?
You keep the MSP if it works. We govern it: scope, service levels, renewals and escalation. If the MSP is the problem, we say so, with evidence, and manage the change properly.
Every contract has an owner. Every AI feature on a renewal is a decision you made on purpose.
You keep the MSP if it works. We govern it: scope, service levels, renewals and escalation, held by a named Head of IT who sits on your side of the table.
Vendor management is one dimension of The Technology Framework. Owned through the seat, or on its own.
Most firms of 50-200 people pay an MSP, a Microsoft partner, a telecoms provider and a shelf of software vendors. Nobody sits above them, and now every one of them is selling AI. AI fails on estates where the vendor layer is ungoverned. This dimension puts one owner there.
The boundary between the MSP, internal staff and every other supplier is agreed and written down. Work stops falling between the gaps, and the invoice matches the scope.
If a supplier is the problem, we say so, with evidence. If a change is needed, we run the selection and the handover properly: requirements, shortlist, evaluation, transition.
We implement and govern. We do not resell, and we do not run the helpdesk. The MSP keeps the queue. We own the answers above it.
AI arrives in most firms through the supplier list, quietly. The MSP adds an AI tier. The document system announces a copilot. The renewal quote grows a new line, and nobody has read the terms behind it. Making the vendor estate AI-ready means putting all of that under governance.
We do not sell AI features, and we do not resell anyone else's. The work is knowing what is in the estate, what it costs, and what it is allowed to touch.
When a vendor's AI feature is genuinely useful, the firm switches it on with confidence. When it is an invoice wearing a capability, the firm says no, with evidence.
The AI dimension itself, strategy through to production, has its own page in the framework. Vendor AI spend rolls up into the cost dimension: one bill somebody reads.
The seat covers all ten dimensions of the framework, vendor management among them. One or two days a week, in the room, governing the MSP and every contract around it.
From £4,750 a monthfor one day a week
Some firms need one thing fixed first: the vendor estate. Any single dimension can be owned on its own, priced in conversation.
See where vendor management sits in the full framework map, alongside the other nine dimensions.
First we listen. We sit with the people who actually run the estate: the MSP, finance, operations, whoever holds the contracts.
Visible progress in weeks, with a board-readable outcome. For this dimension, often the vendor map, the renewal calendar and the first proper MSP review.
It's your call. Keep the seat filled at one or two days a week, or keep the map, the calendar and the review rhythm and run it yourselves. Either way the place is stronger.
The same rhythm as how we work across every dimension of the framework.
You keep the MSP if it works. We govern it: scope, service levels, renewals and escalation. If the MSP is the problem, we say so, with evidence, and manage the change properly.
A written scope of who does what. Service levels measured against the contract. A review rhythm that actually happens. A renewal calendar with time to negotiate. Escalations that land with a named owner.
No. The Microsoft partner, the telecoms provider, the software vendors, the cyber suppliers: every contract with a renewal date belongs on one map, with one owner above it.
Yes. Requirements, shortlist, evaluation, transition. We sit on your side of the table, and the recommendation is written down so the board can see how the decision was made.
Ask what it does, what it costs and where the data goes, in writing. If the answers hold up, it goes on the vendor map with an owner. If they do not, it comes off at renewal.
It is a dimension of the framework, never a menu item. Most firms own it through the fractional Head of IT seat, from £4,750 a month. It can also be owned on its own, priced in conversation.
A named senior. The person in the conversation is the person who reads the contracts, sits in the MSP reviews and writes the board paper.
The first conversation costs nothing and changes what happens next. Bring the thing that hurts, or the thing you want to build.
Talk to an agent starts a voice conversation with our own AI agent, right here on the page. Prefer email? Pick the thing that hurts above and your mail app opens with the subject filled in. Nothing sends from this page.
Prefer to write first? Pick a chip on the left and your mail app opens with the subject filled in.