Fund AI from the waste in the bill.
Cost is one of the ten dimensions of The Technology Framework: the cloud bill, licences, contracts and renewals, owned. It is also where AI-readiness starts: AI fails on estates where the spend is ungoverned. A named Head of IT holds the dimension alongside the other nine, or it is entered on its own through a fixed piece of work.
This becomes the new norm: contracts renew because you chose to renew them, every AI licence, pilot and token budget has an owner, and the board reads a cost line it can trust.
That is the one-line version on the framework map. Made concrete, ownership of the cost dimension looks like this.
None of this is exotic. It is the ordinary discipline most firms of 50-200 never had anyone to own.
80%off a live cloud bill
One estate moved, one bill brought down. We publish the number because it happened. We do not promise it, because your estate is different.
What the dimension does promise is ownership: the bill read, the licences counted, the renewals decided by someone whose name is on them.
Cost never sits alone. The contracts and the MSP relationship sit with vendor management. The estate the bill pays for sits with infrastructure. The daily run that quietly creates spend sits with operations.
One framework holds them together, so a saving in one dimension is checked against the others before anyone calls it a saving. The full map is on the homepage.
Licences, tokens, copilots and cloud on one bill somebody reads. That is the cost dimension's job in an AI-ready estate, and the work is specific.
Everyone tells firms to adopt AI. Nobody owns making the firm ready, and the first symptom is the bill: seats bought in a hurry, pilots that renew themselves, tokens metered in a currency nobody translates.
Govern the spend and the rest of the AI agenda gets easier: pilots can be compared, waste in the existing bill can fund the next piece of work, and when a workflow goes live its running cost and what it saves sit on the same page.
If the technology bill is the thing that hurts, the route in is the technology cost reduction sprint. A fixed piece of work a finance director can read: cloud, licences, vendor contracts and telephony.
If the sprint will not pay for itself, we say so at diagnose and stop. You know the downside before we start.
Most firms buy this dimension through the fractional Head of IT seat. A named senior, one or two days a week, holding the renewal calendar, the licence count and the bill alongside the other nine dimensions.
There is no priced cost-management package here. The seat covers all ten dimensions. Any single dimension can be owned on its own, priced in conversation. The sprint exists for the one case where a fixed fee is honest: a cloud bill large enough to fund the work.
First we listen. Finance, the MSP, whoever holds the invoices. The bill, the licence schedule and the contract list come out of the drawer and onto one page.
Visible progress in weeks. A contract register with owners and dates. A bill that is tagged and read. A cost line the board can read without a translator.
It's your call. Keep the seat filled at one or two days a week, or keep the register and run it yourselves. Either way the place is stronger.
Cost runs on the same rhythm as everything else under the framework. It starts at diagnose, lands its first visible progress in weeks, and then the decision belongs to you. The same three steps are on the homepage.
No. Sometimes the right move is spending more in one place and less in three others. The dimension is about ownership: every pound has an owner, a reason and a renewal date someone chose. Cuts follow where the numbers justify them.
If the bill itself is the pain, start with the sprint. If cost is one of several dimensions nobody owns, the seat covers all ten. The first conversation settles this quickly.
That number comes from one live bill. We publish it because it happened. We do not promise it, because your estate is different. What you get at diagnose is a straight answer about what your bill can and cannot do.
Yes. If the sprint will not pay for itself at that size, we say so at diagnose and stop. Below that line, cost is owned through the seat, or as a single dimension priced in conversation.
No. The sprint is a fixed fee, scoped at diagnose. The seat is published at from £4,750 a month. Nothing here bills on a percentage of the saving.
No. The FD keeps the budget. This gives the FD a technology counterpart: someone who can read the Azure invoice, challenge a renewal, and put the numbers in a board paper with a recommendation.
The first conversation costs nothing and changes what happens next. Bring the thing that hurts, or the thing you want to build.
Talk to an agent starts a voice conversation with our own AI agent, right here on the page. Prefer email? Pick the thing that hurts above and your mail app opens with the subject filled in. Nothing sends from this page.
UK-wide. The public number is 0117. The registered office is in London.
